SIGNAL™ Intelligence · Built in Europe · Global

Know what
your people
won't tell you.

Is your team flying — or quietly burning out? What they say vs what they think. Actions vs feelings. Managers as multipliers of good and bad. tru.place turns silence into signal.

$94K
cost of one senior exitvaries by market
98%
WhatsApp open rate
30s
one question / day
6–8wk
cascade detected early
Grounded in
Edmondson · Harvard Google Project Aristotle Deci & Ryan · SDT Hochschild · UC Berkeley Dweck · Stanford
§ 01 · The problem · Why HR tools fail

Annual surveys are theatre. eNPS is a number without a cause. Managers misread team signals 50–60% of the timeScientific basisResearch synthesis on manager perception accuracyEdmondson · Aristotle · Gallup synthesisProjection based on published research. tru.place will publish validated data after 6 months of operation..

Most organizations measure how their people feel once a year — long after the decisions to leave have been made.

The enterprise tools that try to fix this — Culture Amp, Glint, Leapsome — cost €8–12 / $8–12 per person per month, take six months to roll out, and produce dashboards that HR reads and the board ignores.

Below that, in the 50–500 person market globally, nothing serious exists. No real-time behavioral signal. No predictive model. No translation into financial risk. No way to know what your people aren't saying out loud — until the resignation letter arrives.

70%+
Companies globallySourceStudies indicate 70%+ of companies have no systematic PS measurementGallup + Deloitte synthesisProjection. tru.place will publish validated data after 6 months of operation. have no systematic way to measure psychological safety.
€10K+
Annual cost of a Culture Amp seat for an 80-person company.
75%
Of annual salary lost per exit. $94K per senior engineerSource75% of annual salary lost per exit (varies by market)SHRM Turnover Report · 2023Reference figure. Actual cost varies by role, seniority, and geography..
12×
Higher delivery delay risk in low-safety teams (Google Aristotle).
Your best engineer is having a conversation with a recruiter right now. Annual surveys won't tell you. eNPS won't tell you. Their manager won't tell you. They won't tell you either — until they hand in the notice.
Built by an HR Manager who lived this problem for 10 years
§ 02 · The framework · Six behaviors, one number

SIGNAL — six behaviors, daily, in thirty seconds.

Not opinions. Behaviors. Did you speak up? Did you ask for help? Did you decide your own approach? Six questions, rotating daily, scored over weeks. The signal is honest because the question is concrete.

S
Safety
to speak
I
Initiative
behavior
G
Group
belonging
N
Need
for autonomy
A
Authenticity
gap
L
Learning
comfort
S
N°1 · Foundation20% weight
Safety to speak
Perceived safety to express opinions, disagree, or admit mistakes without fear of punishment or embarrassment.
Did you feel comfortable sharing a different opinion in a meeting today?
OpinionMistakeHelpChallenge
Risk: S < 55
Edmondson · Harvard
I
N°2 · Action15% weight
Initiative behavior
Observable actions taken — speaking in meetings, raising issues, volunteering for risk. Behavior, not feeling.
Did you speak up at least once in a meeting this week?
VoiceActionRisk
Risk: I↓ S↔ = suppression
Morrison & Milliken
G
N°3 · Belonging15% weight
Group belonging
Sense of inclusion, relatedness, and being valued as a full and equal member of the team. Belonging ≠ inclusion.
Did you feel like a valued member of your team today?
InclusionBelongingRecognitionConnection
Risk: G+N drop = isolation
Deci & Ryan · SDT
N
N°4 · Agency15% weight
Need for autonomy
Degree of agency over work — decisions, methods, direction. The micromanagement detector.
Did you have the freedom to decide how to do your work today?
DecisionMethodPace
Risk: N < 45 · 3w
SCARF · Rock
A
N°5 · Predictive20% weight
Authenticity gap
Distance between how someone truly feels and how they behave at work. A gap > 30pts = 67% exit probability in 90 daysScientific basisProjected from Edmondson's interpersonal risk frameworkAmy C. Edmondson · Harvard · 1999tru.place projection based on published research. Validated data after 6 months of operation..
Did you feel you could be yourself at work today?
EmotionalOpinionIdentityEnergy
Risk: A gap > 30
Hochschild · Seligman
L
N°6 · Recovery15% weight
Learning comfort
Willingness to admit ignorance, experiment, and fail without fear of judgment. Last to fall, first to signal recovery.
Did you feel safe admitting you didn't know something today?
IgnoranceExperimentFailure
Risk: L↓ 3 weeks = burnout
Dweck · Stanford
SIGNAL™ Intelligence System
Five layers · One signal · Built layer on layer.
Layer 01
SIGNAL™ Core
→ measures
6 nodes · 21 sub-clusters · 63 behavioral proxies.
Layer 02
SIGNAL™ Pulse
→ trajectory
Score 61 today is nothing. Score 61 that was 74 three weeks ago is everything.
Layer 03
SIGNAL™ Echo
→ reciprocity
Reciprocity loop. Without it, people stop being honest. The flywheel fuel.
Layer 04
SIGNAL™ Equity
→ DEI lens
Same score 68 can hide a 26-point equity gap. EU DEI Directive auditable (and equivalent local regulations).
Layer 05
SIGNAL™ Diagnose
→ root cause
24 diagnostic patterns. Not what is wrong — why, who caused it, what to do this week.
§ 03 · The cascade · Why exits are predictable

The signature is six to eight weeks long. We catch it in the second.

When safety drops, behavior follows a sequence that repeats across teams, sectors, and countries. Initiative stalls, the authenticity gap widens, learning shuts down. Burnout and flight risk materialize last. tru.place learns the signature from completed cascades and runs the pattern backwards in real time.

Week 0
Safety drops
A reorg lands. A peer is fired. A meeting goes badly. Disagreement starts to feel risky.
S −12
Week 1–2
Initiative stalls
People keep showing up but stop pushing back. The room nods. Decisions made without challenge.
I −8
Week 2–3
Authenticity widens
Emotional labor goes up. "I'm fine" replaces "I'm not". The most predictive signal in the model.
A gap +18
Week 3–4
Learning shuts down
People stop asking. They hide unfinished work. The cost of being wrong has become too high.
L −9
Week 6–8
Flight risk materializes
The recruiter call happens. The CV gets updated. By the time the notice arrives, the decision is 6 weeks old.
Exit risk
Pattern match

87% of completed cascades match a known signature.

The predictive model is trained on real outcomes — exits, burnout leave, internal escalations — and runs the pattern backwards in real time. By Week 2, alerts fire. By Week 4, the manager has three ranked actions and a 4-week projection under three echo scenarios.

§ 04 · The channel · Where the signal lives

One question. Thirty seconds. Delivered where people already are.

Email surveys get 20% open rates and zero honesty. We deliver on the channel each person chooses — WhatsApp, Slack, MS Teams, Telegram or email — at 8:30 in the morning, one behavioral question, three taps, done. No new apps to install. No friction.

98%
WhatsApp open rateSourceWhatsApp Business reported message open ratesWhatsApp Business · MetaReported industry benchmark for business messaging. Your actual rates may vary by audience and timing.
Compared to 20% for HR email. The channel is the product. People read it because they were going to look at WhatsApp anyway.
30s
Per check-in
One question, rotating through the six nodes. Single tap to answer. Designed to be done while waiting for coffee.
≥ 5
Anonymity floor
Manager sees team patterns only — never individual responses. Below five people per team, no data is shown at all.
Opt-in
Local data residency · opt-out anytime
Reply STOP to leave. Phone numbers hashed on ingestion. Data stored in the region of the company (EU · BR · US · APAC). GDPR Article 25 by design.

Works where your people already are.

Each person chooses their channel · No new app
Slack
Free
90% open
If your company uses Slack.
MS Teams
Free
85% open
If your company uses Teams.
Telegram
Free
80% open
Universal alternative.
Email
Free
~35% open
Always works. Lowest engagement.
WhatsApp Enterprise
Premium delivery
98% open
Highest engagement channel.
tru.place app
Coming · Year 2
~95% push
Native iOS · Android · zero delivery cost.
Each person picks their own channel during onboarding — independently of colleagues. The signal is what matters. The channel is how it arrives.
🔒

The anonymity floor — non-negotiable.

Below 5 people on a team, no data is shown. Ever. Your manager sees team patterns. Never your individual answers. Never. Phone numbers hashed before storage — we can't reverse it. Neither can anyone else. GDPR Article 25 · Privacy by Design · Built in Europe · Data stored in your region.

§ 05 · Four languages · One product

One product. Four languages. The language adapts — the signal doesn't.

tru.place speaks to four people in four languages. Same product. Same data. Different words for different audiences. People think things they never say. Managers know things they can't prove. Boards decide on incomplete information. tru.place closes the gap.

Psychological Safety

Your voice is protected.

What you signal never reaches your manager with your name attached. Below 5 people on a team — no data shown. Ever. Your honesty makes your workplace better. That's the only reason we exist.

My SIGNAL68
StrongestL · 84
To watchN · 51
Streak12 days · Echo received ×3
People Intelligence

You sense something is wrong. You just can't prove it.

SIGNAL™ gives you the pattern, the cause, and the one action that changes the trajectory — this week. Not generic advice. Not a dashboard to read. A surgical diagnosis you can act on tomorrow morning.

Team SIGNAL61 · ↓7
PatternL1 · Blame Culture
Lowest nodeA · 42
Action this weekOpen meeting w/ "what didn't go as planned?"
Risk Intelligence

You're not managing people. You're managing risk.

Your team SIGNAL is 58. Industry benchmark: 74. 3 flight-risk profiles. Cost of inaction: $2.1M. tru.place gives you the number. The seat at the table that people never get is now in the room with you.

Org Score58 / 74 ind.
Financial exposure$2.1M / yr
Flight risk profiles3
ROI of acting127× †
The Seat at the Table

The voice that never gets a seat at the table — now has one.

"People think things they never say.
Managers know things they can't prove.
Boards decide on incomplete information.

tru.place is the seat at the table that your people never get."

§ 06 · The Echo loop · Why people stay honest

If signals don't change anything, people stop being honest. So we built reciprocity as a first-class feature.

SIGNAL Echo is the layer that closes the loop. Managers act. The system logs. Collaborators see something changed because of signals like theirs. Trust compounds. The signal stays honest. Without Echo, the flywheel stops.

1

Signal

Collaborator answers daily check-in. System aggregates patterns at the team level — never individuals.

2

Act

Manager receives the alert and three ranked actions. Picks one. Opens a 1:1. Shifts a protocol.

3

Log

Action is logged — by the manager in one click, by calendar (1:1 detected), or by collaborator confirmation.

4

Echo

Collaborator is told: "Your team's signal led to X." Never reveals individuals. Trust compounds. Honesty deepens.

§ 07 · SIGNAL™ Diagnose · Clinical intelligenceRoadmap · Phase 2

Not what. Why. Who caused it. What to do. This week.

Every other tool tells you what is wrong. SIGNAL™ Diagnose tells you why, who caused it, what to do, and what happens if you don't. 24 diagnostic patterns across 4 clusters. Triangulated from a minimum of 3 independent behavioral signals before any diagnosis fires.

L
Leader-caused
4 patterns
Blame Culture · Micromanagement Trap · Silent Room · Humble Deficit
T
Team-caused
3 patterns
Execution Trap · Belonging Fracture · Authenticity Crisis
S
System-caused
2 patterns
Post-Restructure Shock · Performance Anxiety
D
DEI-caused
1 pattern
Voice Inequality
Pattern L1 · Blame Culture · Engineering Team · Week 11
Your team is hiding mistakes.
Confidence: HIGH · 3 signals

What is happening

Your team is hiding mistakes. Not because they make more — because they've learned that surfacing errors has consequences here.

Why · root cause

Leader behaviour in failure situations. How errors are discussed (or not) in team settings — specifically since the Sprint 8 failure three weeks ago.

This week · one action only

In your next team meeting, open with: "What's something that didn't go as planned, and what did we learn?" Say it first. About yourself.

The science

Edmondson 1999: best teams report MORE errors, not fewer. Bandura: team mirrors leader's response. Weiner: blame = external attribution.

If nothing changes · W+4
Score 54 · €188K at risk
If acted this week · W+4
Score 66 · +12pts · −60% risk
§ 08 · SIGNAL™ Equity · The DEI lensRoadmap · Phase 3

Same score of 68 can hide a 26-point equity gap.

Without the Equity layer, injustice is invisible. We measure score by gender, ethnicity, LGBTQ+ identity, neurodivergence, seniority — minimum 5 per group, shown only to HR and Board.

An overall score of 68 looks fine on the dashboard. It hides the fact that some groups feel safe to speak and others don't. Voice gets unevenly distributed. Recognition gets unevenly attributed. The average looks healthy. The structure isn't.

SIGNAL™ Equity audits every node by demographic group. When the gap crosses 15 points, Pattern D1 (Voice Inequality) fires and the case is escalated to HR — not the manager.

The EU DEI Reporting Directive — and equivalent local regulations — will require organizations to evidence equity in psychological safety. tru.place already has your audit trail.

EU DEI Directive · UK Equality Act · US EEO-1 · auditable
Equity audit · Engineering org · Q2
Overall SIGNAL · 68
Group A
74
Group B
71
Group C
67
Group D
52
Gap: 22pts
Pattern D1 · Escalate to HR
§ 09 · The math · People risk, live in eurosRoadmap · Phase 2

Every score is also a number on a P&L.

Boards don't act on engagement scores. They act on financial exposure. Move the sliders. tru.place translates SIGNAL into the language the CFO already speaks — turnover, productivity, absenteeism — using methodology from SHRM, McKinsey, Gallup, and Google Project Aristotle.

Risk Brief · Live · Confidential
Your company · Drag to recalculate
Method: SHRM · McKinsey · Gallup · Aristotle
Projected turnoverSHRM · 75% salary × exit rate€1.20M
Productivity lossMcKinsey · 12% output gap€890K
AbsenteeismGallup · 17 extra days / FTE€340K
Return on tru.place · live calculation
127×
Total at risk · 12mo€2.43M
Recoverable with tru.place€680K
tru.place cost
12K
Recovery
€680K
Breakeven
≈ 4 wk
Methodology: SHRM turnoverSourceSHRM Turnover Report (2023): ~75% of annual salary cost per exitSHRM · 2023Reference figure. Actual cost varies by role, seniority, and geography. · McKinsey productivity (−12%)SourceMcKinsey Health Institute (2022): ~12% productivity loss on disengaged workersMcKinsey Health Institute · 2022Published research synthesis. Your actual results may vary. · Gallup absenteeism (+17 days)SourceGallup State of Workplace (2024): ~17 additional absent days/yearGallup · 2024Reference figure based on Gallup's published data. · Google Aristotle delivery delaySourceGoogle Project Aristotle (2015): PS = #1 team performance factorGoogle re:Work · 2015 · 180+ teamsPublished research, three-year study of 180+ teams.
v2.0 / live
§ 10 · The science behind SIGNAL™

30 years of organizational psychology — translated into 30 seconds a day.

SIGNAL™ doesn't invent the science. It synthesizes 11 peer-reviewed frameworks into a behavioral measurement instrument. Two pillars carry it.

/01 · Pillar one
Amy Edmondson
Harvard Business School · 1999–2024
"The best teams don't make fewer mistakes — they report more of them."
01
The Nursing Paradox (1999). Better teams reported more errors. Not more mistakes — more safety to surface them.
02
Learning vs Execution Zone. Low PS → conformity rewarded, errors hidden, innovation impossible.
03
The Leader Sets the Climate. Three behaviors destroy PS: punishing errors publicly, deciding before asking, disinterest in team ideas.
04
Frame the Work. Leaders who frame work as uncertain and complex make voice feel necessary.
05
Humble Inquiry (with Schein). Asking genuinely is the most powerful leadership act.
/02 · Pillar two
Google · Aristotle
Google Research · 2015 · 180 teams · 3 yearsSource"What Makes a Team Great" — Project AristotleGoogle re:Work · 2015Three-year study of 180+ Google teams. Psychological safety identified as #1 predictor of team performance.
"Who is on a team matters less than how they interact."
01
Psychological safety = #1 factor of high-performing teams.
02
Conversational turn-taking. Equal voice distribution predicts performance. (Validated Node I.)
03
Social sensitivity. Reading the room predicts performance. (Validated Node A.)
04
Dependability. Completing high-quality work on time.
05
Meaning & impact. Work matters to the person and to the org.
"Psychological safety is the single biggest differentiator between teams that perform and teams that don't."
Aristotle finding · 180+ Google teams · 2015
Contemporary Voices
Contemporary voices

New generations recognize these names. The science is the same — the language speaks to today.

These authors didn't invent the foundations of SIGNAL™. They translate them — into language that today's managers, founders and readers actually meet.

/12
Adam Grant
Wharton · UPenn · 2013–2021
"Think Again" · "Give and Take"
Reciprocity as organizational force. Psychological safety as prerequisite for learning from disagreement.
Echo Layer
/13
Brené Brown
University of Houston · 2012
"Vulnerability is the birthplace of innovation."
Daring Greatly (2012). Vulnerability requires psychological safety to exist.
Node A
/14
Simon Sinek
Leaders Eat Last · 2014
"Some leaders make everyone smarter. Others drain intelligence."
Managers as amplifiers — of good and bad.
Diagnose · L
/15
Liz Wiseman
Multipliers · 2010
"Multipliers get 2× the intelligence from their people."
Direct precursor to SIGNAL™ Diagnose L-cluster framing.
Diagnose · L
/16
Daniel Kahneman
Princeton · Nobel · 2011
"Thinking, Fast and Slow" — anchoring · loss aversion · System 2.
Cognitive biases that make psychological safety harder to build.
Diagnose · Patterns
Scientific basis (synthesized, not copied) Edmondson · Aristotle · Deci & Ryan (SDT) · Rock (SCARF) · Hochschild · Seligman · Dweck · Maslach · Crenshaw · Hobfoll · Bandura · Schein · Honne vs Tatemae (Japanese · what you truly think vs what you show) · the concept of holding space — that led to the name tru.place.
§ 11 · The data moat · Why this isn't a feature war

The dataset no one else will have.

After 50,000+ users and three years across 30+ countries, tru.place will know what patterns precede exits in PT vs BR vs US vs SG. Which interventions work in which cultural contexts. How psychological safety differs across industries and geographies. The most complete dataset of PS behavioral signals in existence — built by the people who use it. Every new user makes it more accurate. Every new country adds cultural context.

"That model is impossible to replicate without time. Time only comes with users. Users only come from being right."
50K
Users in 3 years · the threshold where the model starts to generalize across countries and sectors.
63
Behavioral proxies · 6 nodes · 21 sub-clusters · the depth nothing else measures.
847
Pattern matches per L1 diagnosis by Year 1 · 84% model accuracy (projected)StatusProjected accuracy of the SIGNAL™ Diagnose enginetru.place · projectionProjection based on triangulation methodology. Validated data will be published after 6 months of operation.. Year 2: 91%.
€0
Replicable without the time and users we will have spent earning. The moat is the data, not the code.
§ 12 · Anonymity by design

The system knows who you are. The people who shouldn't know — don't.

Privacy is not a feature we layered on. It's the architecture. GDPR Article 25 by design, EU-stored, phone numbers hashed on ingestion. Below five people per team, the dashboard shows nothing at all.

GDPR Art. 25 · EU-native

The Anonymity Contract

"You can be honest because the people who could punish you for it will never know it was you."

  1. Phone numbers are hashed on ingestion. Nobody at your company — including HR — can match a signal to a person.
  2. Managers see team patterns, never individual answers. The dashboard literally cannot display an individual response.
  3. Below five people per team, no data is shown. The anonymity floor is enforced in software, not in policy.
  4. All data stored in the EU. Supabase EU region. No transatlantic transfer. SOC 2 Type II on the roadmap.
  5. Opt-in only. Explicit WhatsApp consent. Reply STOP at any time. History deleted on request within 30 days.
  6. The Echo loop never reveals individuals. "Your team signalled concerns about autonomy" — not "Sofia said her N score was 44."
Signed at design time · tru.placeEU · Supabase

Who sees what

Visibility is encoded into the schema. Every query is bounded by the role of the requester. No view, no API, no admin tool can route around it.

Collaborator
Their own full data, history, and resources.
Manager
Team SIGNAL patterns and trends — never individual responses.
HR
Department-level aggregates, heatmap, global benchmark comparison.
Board
Org score, financial exposure, manager echo rate — period.

Why this is the architecture, not the policy

Policy is a promise. Architecture is a constraint. If a query can't return individual data, no leak, no misconfiguration, and no bad-actor admin can produce it. That's the bar.

Visibility by team size — encoded in software, not policy.

1–4 people
You seeYour own data only. Your score, trajectory, resources.
Manager seesGlobal benchmark only. No team aggregate.
5–19 people
You seeYour score + anonymous team comparison ("you're above/below avg").
Manager seesTeam patterns + SIGNAL™ Diagnose. Never individuals.
20+ people
You seeYour score + team + company comparison.
Manager seesHeatmap + sub-team analysis.
500+ people
You seeAbove + sector/country benchmark.
Board seesOrg score + financial exposure + full benchmark: team → company → industry → country → global.
§ 13 · Pricing · Built for the SME European market

Two plans. One signal.

One plan for individuals. One plan for companies. No tier confusion. No upsell traps. Volume discounts on Enterprise scale with team size — but never below the Individual price.

All plans: below 5 people on a team — no data shown. Ever. · Currency adapts to your location.

IndividualFor collaborators
Individual
5per person
/ month
Your check-in. Your score. Your voice — protected. No company required. Pay for yourself · invite colleagues · earn free months.
  • Daily check-in (your channel — you choose)
  • Personal SIGNAL™ score · 6 nodes
  • Weekly personal trajectory
  • Curated resources when a node drops
  • Referral — invite colleagues → earn free months
  • Always anonymous. Always.
Referral mechanic
Invite a colleague → +1 month free for you
They join → 2 months free for them
Start →
EnterpriseVolume discounts
Enterprise
10per person
/ month · base
For HR · CEO · CFO · Manager. Everyone sees what the team truly signals. Scales down with team size — never below Individual.
  • Everything in Individual for every collaborator
  • Manager dashboard (team score + trajectory + alerts)
  • HR dashboard (org heatmap · flight risk · burnout watch)
  • CEO / CFO view (financial exposure in local currency)
  • AI-generated weekly insight email (Claude API)
  • Anonymity floor — below 5 people, no data shown. Ever.
Volume discounts
1–49 people10— base
50–199 people8−20%
200–499 people6−40%
500+ people5−50% · floor
Talk to the founder →
Anonymity floorBelow 5 people on a team — no data shown. Ever.
CurrencyShown based on your location (€ Europe · $ rest).
Enterprise floorPrice never goes below Individual (5).
§ 14 · The flywheel · How tru.place grows

The product is the sales motion.

The more teams signal honestly, the sharper your benchmark becomes. Your industry. Your country. Your moment in time. Not just data about your team — context that makes it mean something.

01
One collaborator starts.
02
Tells their manager it's useful.
03
Manager proposes to HR.
04
HR buys the license.
05
Company expands to all teams.
06
Refers to a peer company.
07
Signal compounds. Benchmark deepens. Moat grows.
The compounding asset

The benchmark sharpens with every team.

Today — you see how your team compares to companies like yours.

Month 6 — you see your industry benchmark. Where your sector stands. What's normal. What's a warning sign.

Year 2 — you see how psychological safety in your industry differs from the global average. Which patterns are universal. Which are specific to your context.

You're not just measuring your team. You're contributing to the most complete people intelligence dataset ever built.

The more honest signals enter the system, the more accurate your benchmark becomes. That accuracy is yours to use.
§ 14 · For the CFO · What we'd say in the room

You don't have an HR problem. You have a balance-sheet problem that walks past your desk every day at nine.

"We already have Culture Amp."
Great. Does it deliver insights on WhatsApp? Does it give you a euro figure for your people risk? Does it predict what will happen in four weeks? Does it close the loop so people see something changed? If not, you have a survey tool. We're a risk intelligence platform.
"We do an annual engagement survey."
Annual surveys tell you what happened. We tell you what's happening — and what will happen in 30 days. The cost of finding out a year late is sitting in your turnover line.
"Our people won't use it."
WhatsApp has a 98% open rate. It takes 30 seconds. And they only keep using it if they see something change — which is why we built the Echo loop as a first-class feature.
"GDPR concerns."
We're built in the EU, store in the EU, hash phone numbers on ingestion, and were designed from day one for GDPR Article 25 (Privacy by Design). We're probably more compliant than whatever survey tool you're currently using.
"It's too expensive."
At €5/person/month for 100 people, that's €6K/year. One retained senior employee saves you €70–150K. You need to keep one person every twelve months for it to pay for itself. Anything beyond that is upside.
§ 15 · Waitlist open · 50 spots

Know what your people won't tell you — before it costs you ninety four thousand euros.

tru.place is in pre-launch. First 50 companies → 3 months free + personal onboarding from the founder, plus a permanent founder-tier price on the Growth plan. No card. No annual contract. Reply STOP to leave anytime.

tru.place Built in Europe · Global reach GDPR Art. 25 Your data stays yours
EU-stored · GDPR Art. 25No card required
3 months free for the first 50 companies
Personal onboarding from the founder
Founder-tier price locked for life on Growth